ecg patterns (Philips Healthcare)
Structured Review

Ecg Patterns, supplied by Philips Healthcare, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/ecg+patterns/pmc10933352-59-2-11?v=Philips+Healthcare
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiography contributes to hyperthyroidism detection and outcome prediction"
Article Title: Artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiography contributes to hyperthyroidism detection and outcome prediction
Journal: Communications Medicine
doi: 10.1038/s43856-024-00472-4
Figure Legend Snippet: a Components of traditional machine learning models for detecting hyperthyroidism (HT). We trained three xgboost models to predict HT using patient characteristics, ECG features, and a combination of both. The sky-blue bars represent patient characteristics, while the reddish-purple bars represent ECG features. b The area under ROC curve (AUC) of all available data on HT. This includes the DLM using ECG waveform data only and the DLM combined with patient characteristics. The sky-blue and reddish-purple bars represent the results of predictions using individual patient characteristics and ECG features, respectively. The vermillion bars represent predictions integrating features from xgboost, and the bluish-green bars represent predictions, including those from DLM. The error bars are the 95% confidence intervals (CI) of each AUC.
Techniques Used:
Figure Legend Snippet: a Distribution of ECG morphologies in overt HT, subclinical HT, and non-HT groups stratified by AI-ECG. This analysis presents the differences in ECG morphologies among different groups, with each group further divided into AI-ECG(+) [representing predicted probabilities greater than the operational cutoff] and AI-ECG(−) [representing predicted probabilities less than the operational cutoff]. For continuous variables, we use boxplots to illustrate their distributions, adjusting for hospitals using linear regression. For categorical variables, we use barplots to depict proportions, adjusting for hospitals using logistic regression. Vermillion, reddish-purple, and bluish-green describe the overt HT, subclinical HT, and non-HT groups, respectively. Blue and orange represent AI-ECG(+) and AI-ECG(−). b Risk analysis of selected ECG morphologies on adverse outcomes. This analysis was conducted using the Cox proportional hazard model and combines results from all hospitals. Hazard ratios were adjusted for hospital, sex, and age. The square and error bar represent the hazard ratios and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). Vermillion, black, and sky blue bars denote significantly positive, non-significant, and negative associations, respectively, with the corresponding outcomes. In this analysis, the standard deviations (SD) of heart rate, PR interval, and QRS duration were 19.5, 31.8, and 17.4, respectively.
Techniques Used:
Figure Legend Snippet: Patients with a prior history of HF were excluded for the analysis of new-onset HF. Vermillion dashed line, reddish-purple dotted line, and bluish-green solid line represent the overt HT, subclinical HT, and non-HT groups, respectively. We have also highlighted the mean age for each group, as the overt HT group is relatively younger than the other groups. This age difference results in a notably higher sex and age-adjusted hazard ratio (HR), especially for new-onset HF. The table displays the at-risk population and cumulative risk for the specified time intervals, categorized by AI-ECG positive and negative.
Techniques Used:
Figure Legend Snippet: a The Kaplan–Meier curve analysis stratified by AI-ECG prediction. For the new-onset HF analysis, we excluded patients with a prior history of HF. Yellow dashed line and blue solid line represent AI-ECG (+) [indicating a predicted probability greater than the operational cutoff] and AI-ECG (−) [indicating a predicted probability less than the operational cutoff], respectively. The hazard ratio (HR) presented here has been adjusted for sex and age using a Cox proportional hazards model. The table displays the at-risk population and cumulative risk for the specified time intervals in AI-ECG positive and negative patients. b Forest plot illustrating the risk of AI-ECG (+) compared to AI-ECG (−) stratified by hyperthyroidism (HT) and non-HT. The HT group includes overt and subclinical HT (Note: Some cases do not belong to either group due to a lack of free T4 results). We provide the event count and total population for each subgroup. The HR presented here was also adjusted for sex and age using a Cox proportional hazards model. In the figure, the black square represents the point estimate of the HR, while the error bars indicate the 95% confidence intervals (CI).
Techniques Used:
Figure Legend Snippet: The performance is presented in bar charts and error bar, which represent the area under ROC curve (AUC) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). The analyses were stratified by data source (orange, yellow, and blue for emergency department [ED], inpatient department [IPD], and outpatient department [OPD]), sex (vermillion and sky blue for female and male), age (shades of reddish-purple from dark to light representing younger to older age), and HT information (1 and 2 representing without HT/ATD history and ECG and TSH within 24 h, in black). The black bars on the right side represent those meeting <60 y/o and conditions 1 and 2. The isolated test set was excluded from this analysis due to its small sample size. We presented the performance in internal test set ( a ) and, community test set ( b ), respectively.
Techniques Used: Isolation
